Saturday, March 16, 2013

Red Dawn 2012 - review

I   don't normally review movies, let alone ones I didn't want to see in the first place.  But I heard from a guy say it was actually pretty good, and it was available streaming.
  I had seen the original Red Dawn, and personally thought it was terrible if slightly interesting.  I vaguely remember wondering what I would do in that situation, and coming up with the conclusion that I wouldn't wear such tight jeans into the woods.  Ya, I probably waited too long to watch it.  So, I went into the remake with that benchmark in mind.

  I, personally, thoroughly enjoyed this film. Yes it had cheesy dialog.  Yes it was predictable.  And yes it was violent. It's an 80s remake.  If you can set aside your agenda, muzzle your politics, and let your imagination fill in for some directing, casting, and dialog issues; you will find an enjoyable, completely plausible depiction of an alternate future for the US.  What would you do?  Are you prepared for something like this, or even something as small as the power grid going down for months?  How would you work, how would you bank, where would you get your food, what would happen if you got sick, who would keep the peace?  You play this game all the time with zombie flicks, disaster movies, and even superhero films.  Why do you so quickly reject something like Red Dawn?  Are you afraid to analyze that situation?  Does it conflict with your opinions or challenge your beliefs on the cost of war, or the cost of apathy for that matter?  Does it start you down a conspiracy rabbit hole, wondering if a coordinated effort could cause financial collapse, world-wide unrest, disarming of American citizens, and the demilitarization of domestic troops?

  So let's talk about the plot without giving a way too many spoilers.  You have your All American small town, All American family, that is swiftly and suddenly overwhelmed by the North Koreans.  Insurgency style resistance ensues.  At face value, there's little here other than a cheap thrill.  But, I think there are some hidden gems of wisdom if you look.

  But let's dig a little deeper (minor spoilers in this section).
  First up, I'm a little shocked at how critics are treating this film.  They didn't just dislike it... they LOATHE it. Check out a site like rotten tomatoes and compare the "professional" critics reviews to their posts about something like Green Zone.  I would say their politics is influencing their job.
  There is some legitimate gripe about Josh Peck's performance.  He and Chris Hemsworth might pass as step-brothers (why wouldn't they cast Liam Hemsworth... that could have made a big difference).  Plus Josh sounds like he's talking with a mouth full of mush... had to watch with subtitles on.
Maybe the most common complaint about the movie is that the North Korean threat to America is "implausible/impossible/stupid".  North Korea has nuclear weapons, a fanatical population base, and the US has deployed only 50% of adequate missile defense systems (ABC News).
  A single nuclear missile, detonated at 35 miles, could destroy the electronic systems for half the US.  Even if key military infrastructure was shielded from this, the panic caused to the affected population would provide ample opportunity for the plot of this film.
  Without a doubt, America is sliding further and further into an economic quagmire.  As the US goes, so will most of the western world.  The forces that currently check powers like North Korea, China, and Russia could become impotent as they struggle with unemployment, homelessness, crime, and poverty.  Without the promise of a firm and swift retaliation, as we had in the Cold War era, the events in Red Dawn become more and more plausible.  Imagine if the western world was in a crippling economic recession, our military, reserves, and National Guard we deployed overseas, military budgets have been demolished to fund social programs, and the Pacific Northwest were invaded by a foreign army.  Would the Federal Government write them off?  You had to think about that for a few seconds didn't you (unless you live there).  You realize that means the sovereignty of the USA is already beginning to crumble?
  That brings me to another common complaint, the "cheesy patriotism".  Let's put politics aside for a second.  Our patriotism has nothing to do with our support of social programs, or gun clubs, woman's rights, or marriage laws.  Our patriotism is the foundation of our national sovereignty.  And that is what protects our rights to establish multiple political viewpoints.  How many political parties exist in North Korea, or China for that matter?  Our patriotism reminds us that while we may vehemently disagree on some issues, we are all Americans, we are responsible for one another, and we are an example to the World.  Our patriotism binds the will of the people into a tangible force, with the power to change the planet for the good.  Without our patriotism we are easily divided and controlled.  I can't believe we're even seeing this dialog.  Who are you people?!
  It wasn't long ago when the very existence of the US was threatened (ask your grandparents if you're too young to remember).  Why do so many Americans believe they're safe now?  Why does it seem like rest of us believe we need to maintain a presence in foreign countries?
    

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Effective Communication

What makes an effective communicator?

How many times have you been in this conversation?
"You never told me that"
"Yes I did!"

Your job as a communicator is more than just wrapping all of the pertinent information into easily digestible paragraphs, though it is certainly part of it. To become an effective communicator you must also:

1. Ensure your audience is in a receptive state.
a. If your audience is bored or if they don't understand your vocabulary they'll hear less than a quarter of the information.
b. If your audience is stressed out and busy with other projects, they'll hear less than half of your message.
c. If your audience is hostile or defensive, guess what, they're not going to hear a word you're saying.

2. Allow your audience plenty of opportunities to retain your message
a. Most of us can only retain a portion of what we hear. That means if you deliver your data flawlessly, the majority of your audience will only remember three-quarters of it.
b. Identify about three of the most important bits of information and be sure to repeat these at least three times during the presentation.
c. Assume that your audience is going to zone in and out during the presenation. To that end, find three different ways of delivering the same information during your intro, in the body of the presentation, and again in conclusion.

3.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Quote for today

I suppose not much has changed over the course of history, and I'm not the first to notice that. But look at how this quote from Henry David Thoreau in Civil Disobedience applies to what we're seeing in the government today.

“Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right.”

Then again, how does this apply today with secular humanism's strangle hold on education and all three branches of government? A citizen can no longer rely on his or her conscience, because that conscience has been conditioned to operate on a subjective level. The power of conscience has been subtly defeated. We no longer rely on an objective, and omnipotent God to define our conscience. As a result we MUST resign to the legislator. We are subjects, no longer men.

Monday, November 29, 2010

A change

This blog is too diverse. So I'm splitting it out. New categories will be:

http://ikhthus.timtroyer.com/ - Religion and Spirituality
http://fitness.timtroyer.com - Health and Fitness
http://tech.timtroyer.com - Science and Technology
http://brew.herfivores.com - Home Brewing

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

The idea - work in progress

Tech's guide to communicating with your CEO/CFO

1. Learn their terminology
How annoying is it when your CFO doesn't understand the basic technology that runs your company? How can they unstand the need for new networking equipment when they can't tell the difference between Gigabits and Gigabytes? Take a few minutes to scour wikipedia or pickup a subscripttion to CFO and CEO magazine.

2. Learn their language
Executives thrive on positive statements of inclusion. Tech, on the other hand, tend to be more practically minded and even think of situations in the worst case scenario mindset. So use conjunctions like "and" instead of "or". Don't tell outright lies, but don't spend undue time laying out all the potential pitfalls of each situation unless specifically asked.

3. Learn their timeline

An industry anew

Onto the buzz words!!
This is mostly digested from the Virtual Infrastructure Yields Real TCO and ROI Advantages paper from the SAPinsder (link at the bottom).
SAP - Systems, applications, and products. Originally developed by 5 IBM employees in 1972, the idea was to provide multiple enterprise applications with a common database structure. SAP's latest software is called R/3, but has since been adapted by a host of other companies (Microsoft for instance). Now it provides the standard for Customer Relations Management (CRM) and Supply Chain Management (SCM).

Why is this good for CFOs?
1. You can do more with less.
SAP typically involves LOTS of server hardware to be depreciated (more on that later), LOTS of server operating systems. This means physical space, power, cooling, IT staff to support it all. It also means new and expensive server hardware to meet the software requirements.
VMware allows you to consolidate those diverse system into an efficient, compact system. Our own experience has shown around 5 to 1, or even higher physical to virtual server consolidation. That means:
a. Less physical space
b. Less power consumption
c. Avoids the new to purchase as much new equipment

Problems
ROI and TCO are notoriously difficult to quantify, particularly when it comes to technology infrastructure. With so many intangibles, indirect costs, and "soft-dollar" considerations (SHUDDER!!! BUZZ WORD - means your company pays fees to a brokerage, which pays hard dollars for the computer equipment you're going to use. See link 2).
We need a detailed and objective approach to ROI and TCO that can be applied by companies of all types and sizes, in any industry sector, for any number of concurrent connections. This is detailed in the white paper "TCO and ROI Analysis of SAP Landscapes Using VMware Technology".
No two companies are alike in the size, scope, and objectives of their technology infrastructure. This diversity means that opportunities for cutting costs and improving productivity through VMware vSphere are likewise diverse. It also means that calculating TCO and ROI requires consideration of a range of variables, such as business risk and high availability.
The above white paper takes a look at four major categories and assesses their contribution to ROI and TCO.
10% Administration (asset management, firmware upgrades, and training)
20% Hardware and Software
30% Downtime (planned or unplanned that affects users)
40% Operation (support, energy costs, scheduled downtime, process and planning)
These are further broken down into direct (budgeted) costs (capital, fees, and labor costs), and indirect (unbudgeted) costs. This measures IT's efficiency at delivering expected services to end users.

The three diverse companies of 400, 200, and 100 users, featured in the white paper, cut their IT infrastructure's TCO by a range of 49% to 83% over 3 years.

1. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vmware.com%2Ffiles%2Fpdf%2Fpartners%2Fsap%2Fvmware-sap-virtualization-tco-roi-article-en.pdf&rct=j&q=vmware%20roi%20for%20the%20cfo&ei=Jf3ZTPCeEqbfnQf2-8ycCg&usg=AFQjCNF5H4-kmOe2_KsIYogsAFYBBD16jQ&cad=rja

2. http://www.hewittinvest.com/pdf/SpotlightOn_Jul04.pdf

3. VMware's TCO and ROI calculator. A truely best case scenario.
http://roitco.vmware.com/vmw/ServerVirtualization/Index

4, Vmware's Cost per Application calculator
http://www.vmware.com/technology/whyvmware/calculator/index.php

Prepping for my CFO/CEO VMware event

So I'm prepping for this VMware event I'm presenting in December. I'm pretty stoked about it, but a bit nervous at the same time. Give me a room full of engineers and I'll wax techy for hours without a nervous sweat or stutter. Now, place me in a room full of executives, which I've fostered emotions for in a special "place" in my heart, and I'm out of my comfort zone. To make matters even more foreign, I'll be replacing my comfortable khakis and polo for my suit and tie... ick. But I'm exciting about the opportunity to branch out my skills. I used to be a pretty good orator... 4th in state for speech and debate and all that.

SO, for the next few blogs you're going to be treated to a host of FUN topics like Return on Investment, Total Cost of Ownership, and other insanely cliche topics. Just so you know, I'll be cringing just as much as you at the industry buzz words... but I suppose most of you wouldn't be thrilled about how VMware optimizes page files in the memory, or how you can integrate multiple wireless access points with WDS and RADIUS. To each their own then.